Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Science Translational Medicine ; 14(672), 2022.
Article in English | Web of Science | ID: covidwho-20231277

ABSTRACT

Although children have been largely spared from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), the emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants of concern (VOCs) with increased transmissibility, combined with fluctuating mask mandates and school reopenings, has led to increased infections and disease among children. Thus, there is an urgent need to roll out COVID-19 vaccines to children of all ages. However, whether children respond equivalently to adults to mRNA vaccines and whether dosing will elicit optimal immunity remain unclear. Here, we aimed to deeply profile the vaccine-induced humoral immune response in 6-to 11-year-old children receiving either a pediatric (50 mu g) or adult (100 mu g) dose of the mRNA-1273 vaccine and to compare these responses to vaccinated adults, infected children, and children who experienced multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C). Children elicited an IgG-dominant vaccine-induced immune response, surpassing adults at a matched 100-mu g dose but more variable immunity at a 50-mu g dose. Irrespective of titer, children generated antibodies with enhanced Fc receptor binding capacity. Moreover, like adults, children generated cross-VOC humoral immunity, marked by a decline of omicron-specific receptor binding domain, but robustly preserved omicron spike protein binding. Fc receptor binding capabilities were also preserved in a dose-dependent manner. These data indicate that both the 50-and 100-mu g doses of mRNA vaccination in children elicit robust cross-VOC antibody responses and that 100-mu g doses in children result in highly preserved omicron-specific functional humoral immunity.

3.
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology ; 228(1 Supplement):S200-S201, 2023.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2175889

ABSTRACT

Objective: To evaluate the impact of a community-based intervention on perinatal mental health in an urban population during the COVID-19 pandemic Study Design: We performed a prospective cohort study of pregnant and postpartum individuals referred to a new community-based intervention, Helping Us Grow Stronger (HUGS/Abrazos). Participants received four virtual acute behavioral health sessions from a cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and trauma-informed care trained social worker, four resource navigation visits with a community health worker, and a care package. Participants completed validated survey instruments assessing mood, anxiety, stress, food insecurity, experience of discrimination, and program satisfaction before and after program completion. Result(s): 103 participants (Table) completed surveys before and after the program. In this urban obstetric population, there were high rates of food insecurity (54%), experiences of discrimination (61%), and COVID-19 infection in pregnancy (62%). Program satisfaction was high (Table). The program was associated with improvement in Edinburgh Postnatal Depression (EPDS) scores (mean 8.3 pre-HUGS vs 6.7 +-5.6 post, p=0.001), with significant reduction in those screened positive for depression (46/103 pre- vs 31/103 post, p< 0.001);improvement in Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) scores (mean 15.4 +- 8.0 (SD) pre vs 13.5+- 7.1 post, p=0.003) with significant reduction in those with moderate or high stress (56/103 pre vs 49/103 post, p< 0.001);and reduction in those screened positive on the PROMIS anxiety scale (46/103 pre vs 40/103 post, p< 0.001). In stratified analyses (Figure), food insecurity, COVID-19 in pregnancy, and experiences of discrimination were associated with improvement in PSS scores and PROMIS anxiety score. Conclusion(s): In a diverse urban cohort, this novel community-based intervention led to improvement in depression, perceived stress, and anxiety, particularly for those with toxic life stressors in pregnancy including food insecurity, discrimination, and COVID-19 infection. [Formula presented] [Formula presented] Copyright © 2022

4.
American Journal of Reproductive Immunology ; 87(SUPPL 1):69, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1927546

ABSTRACT

Problem: There is a persistent bias toward increased severity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in males. Etiologies of this sex difference remain incompletely understood. Interferon responses have been implicated as a modulator of COVID-19 disease in adults, and play a key role in the placental antiviral response. The interferon response has also been shown to alter Fc receptor expression, and thereforemay impact placental antibody transfer to the fetus. Method of Study: We examined viral-induced placental interferon responses, maternal-fetal antibody transfer, and sex differences in this regard in pregnant individuals infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Placental Fc receptor abundance, interferon stimulated gene (ISG) expression, and SARS-CoV-2 antibody transfer were interrogated in 68 human pregnancies. Results: Sexually dimorphic expression of placental Fc receptors, and interferon-stimulated genes and proteins was observed following maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection, with upregulation of these features in placental tissue of pregnant individuals with male fetuses. Reduced maternal SARS-CoV-2-specific antibody titers and impaired placental antibody transfer were also observed in pregnancies with a male fetus. Conclusions: These results demonstrate fetal sex-specific placental innate immune responses to SARS-CoV-2.

5.
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology ; 224(2):S568-S569, 2021.
Article in English | Web of Science | ID: covidwho-1141179
6.
Glycobiology ; 30(12):1041-1041, 2020.
Article in English | Web of Science | ID: covidwho-1058767
7.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 7(11): ofaa524, 2020 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1035602

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Reports of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection have focused on pregnant women hospitalized due to moderate to severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) or asymptomatic women diagnosed through universal screening at the time of obstetric admission. Many pregnant women who have symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection may not meet criteria for hospitalization; however, whether and how these women can be managed safely in outpatient setting is not well described. METHODS: We sought to describe the time to symptom and viral clearance and to identify predictors of hospitalization to better understand the safety of monitoring pregnant patients with symptomatic COVID-19 in the outpatient setting. We performed a retrospective cohort study of pregnant patients with symptomatic, confirmed COVID-19 illness at a large, academic medical center. Patients had systematic telehealth follow up by a clinician team to assess for symptoms, provide virtual prenatal care, and arrange in-person visits when appropriate in a dedicated outpatient center. Data were collected via chart abstraction. RESULTS: Of 180 pregnant patients presenting with symptoms and undergoing reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing, 67 patients with confirmed COVID-19 infection were identified during the study period. Nineteen (28%) required acute care given worsening of COVID-19 symptoms, and 95% of these were directed to this acute care setting due to symptom severity telehealth evaluation. Nine women (13%) were admitted to the hospital given worsening symptoms, 3 required intensive care unit care, 2 required ventilatory support, and 2 required delivery. Women with the presenting symptoms of fever, cough, shortness of breath, chest pain, or nausea and vomiting were more likely to require admission. The median duration from initial positive test to RT-PCR viral clearance was 26 days. Disease progression, time to viral clearance, and duration of symptoms did not vary significantly by trimester of infection. CONCLUSIONS: Management of the majority of pregnant women with symptomatic COVID-19 illness can be accomplished in the outpatient setting with intensive and protocol-driven monitoring for symptom progression.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL